Time  Nick        Message
01:48 MTDiscord   <luatic> not very and for a bunch of reasons, but things are coming together, slowly
01:48 MTDiscord   <luatic> i took the liberty to add a new "physics" label btw
01:58 MTDiscord   <luatic> i think it's time we start thinking about properly abstracting "colliders" like other engines
11:53 MTDiscord   <the4spaceconstants2181> so, question: is there a way to have an entity with a collider not care about movement?
11:59 MTDiscord   <luatic> what do you mean by that? you can have a static, immovable entity with a collisionbox; you can have a pointable entity that does not collide.
12:28 MTDiscord   <jordan4ibanez> I think they want to disable all movement on the entity so it is not a fake static collider, it is an actual static collider that set_velocity has no affect on
12:28 MTDiscord   <jordan4ibanez> .
12:29 MTDiscord   <jordan4ibanez> ( sorry I dropped something on my keyboard )
17:44 SFENCE_arch Btw: https://pastebin.com/ZXum4zj9 potencial problem or not?
17:54 MTDiscord   <luatic> i think this is a false positive which we had an issue for
19:43 MTDiscord   <.zenonseth> I was thinking about this since mentinoing the cylindrical collision, but I left a comment on one of the non axis-aligned boxes issue on GH. I think that's probably a better approach along with supporting spheres. I'm kind of interested in this tbh
22:12 MTDiscord   <the4spaceconstants2181> we need more image manipulation?
23:25 MTDiscord   <nathan4220776> We always need more image manipulation.