Time Nick Message 00:36 sofar and v-rob's UI prototype, yes 08:47 sfan5 I think the most important point is a rough consensus on the way forward with these features 09:24 sfan5 if there are complaints I would merge #17090 in 30m 09:24 ShadowBot https://github.com/luanti-org/luanti/issues/17090 -- Bump GitHub Actions used by Docker workflow and disable cache by AFCMS 09:24 sfan5 (fixes the CI being all red) 09:37 Krock sfan5: would you please be so nice to add #17078 to the merge queue? 09:37 ShadowBot https://github.com/luanti-org/luanti/issues/17078 -- [NO SQUASH] Deduplicate guiScrollBar code, expose header by SmallJoker 09:37 sfan5 sure 09:37 Krock :^) 09:37 sfan5 also s/if there are complaints/if there are no complaints/ 10:15 sfan5 done 11:29 Desour ~tell sofar for SSCSM, look at "Possible follow-up PRs" in #15818. I'd be happy to give more details. (and sorry, I haven't spent much time on luanti lately (and dont really have time now), I would've otherwise submitted a PR to bring sscsm further already) 11:29 ShadowBot Desour: OK. 13:57 [MatrxMT] Feature freeze starting tomorrow so as to release as agreed (April 30)? 15:18 sfan5 dunno 15:18 sfan5 I guess we should have a meeting to decide which PRs are exempt? 15:29 [MatrxMT] There are just 4 at the moment 16:54 sfan5 rubenwardy: https://forum.luanti.org/viewtopic.php?p=450262#p450262 17:08 MTDiscord I would still appreciate #15451 if possible 17:08 ShadowBot https://github.com/luanti-org/luanti/issues/15451 -- [no sq] Make Luanti buildable with ANGLE for macOS, iOS and iPhoneSimulator and runnable on iPhoneSimulator by sfence 17:10 sfan5 did I miss the answer to when I asked why that PR was important for you last time? 17:14 Krock sfan5: nothing missed. https://irc.luanti.org/luanti-dev/2026-04-06#i_6322412 17:17 MTDiscord sfan5: Post FOSDEM one of primary items of feedback from Educators was support for iOS, as they often don't have a choice in what devices they get to purchase using grants. If all reviews have been addressed, there is no reason not to merge it, especially as it isnt a user-facing change yet. I'd like it to not get stuck in rebase hell, and SFENCE doesn't get a lot of time to work on things so I'd like to make good use of their 17:17 MTDiscord efforts. 17:18 MTDiscord one of the* 17:20 sfan5 that's a good reason to get it in quickly but doesn't specifically relate to the feature freeze. in other words, the timing of full iOS support in Luanti is not going to change by whether we get this in for 5.16.0 or 5.17.0. 17:23 MTDiscord Correct, and I wanted this done far earlier. As long as receiving no reviews for the duration of the freeze doesn't hinder it's progress, I don't care that much. Mostly a matter of principle. 17:23 sfan5 anyway I was just curious 17:24 MTDiscord Sorry for not answering last time; iOS was addressed in -irc and here on Discord a few times so it slipped my mind 17:26 MTDiscord Whenever it does pick back up, ping me if I need to test the build again 17:41 sofar would it help if someone rebased it for them? 19:01 MTDiscord if github's web interface is not lying again, the rebase should be trivial 19:18 sofar one conflict in src/CMakeLists.txt 19:27 sofar easy enough to fix, but the web interface can't automatically I think