| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:10 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 01:45 |
MTDiscord |
<exe_virus> Has anyone asked an AI for suggestions, seems like we're spitballing. |
| 02:02 |
MTDiscord |
<exe_virus> It had some, not bothering to share. Only one was unique, the rest were "get transparent sorting right" |
| 02:07 |
cheapie |
I turned transparency sorting off ages ago since it's so slow, I don't think I've noticed a single difference expect for one time when I put something together specifically to cause issues |
| 02:32 |
|
fluxionary joined #luanti-dev |
| 02:38 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 03:12 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 03:17 |
|
fluxionary joined #luanti-dev |
| 03:40 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 03:55 |
|
fluxionary joined #luanti-dev |
| 05:00 |
|
MTDiscord joined #luanti-dev |
| 05:00 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 06:44 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #luanti-dev |
| 07:21 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 07:50 |
|
fluxionary joined #luanti-dev |
| 08:56 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 09:14 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 09:22 |
|
Warr1024 joined #luanti-dev |
| 09:47 |
|
Warr1024 joined #luanti-dev |
| 10:08 |
sfan5 |
fwiw the default transparency sorting settings have been nerfed a lot, so it shouldn't cause issues by default anymore |
| 10:09 |
sfan5 |
@luatic isn't that what we do? or do you mean with a trick like rendering depth-only first and then the whole thing again? |
| 10:12 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #luanti-dev |
| 10:22 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #luanti-dev |
| 10:32 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 10:39 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #luanti-dev |
| 11:42 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 12:06 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> @luatic |
| 12:19 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 12:23 |
|
Fixer joined #luanti-dev |
| 12:24 |
|
Fixer joined #luanti-dev |
| 12:38 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 12:53 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #luanti-dev |
| 13:00 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #luanti-dev |
| 13:17 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #luanti-dev |
| 13:36 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> sfan5: what we currently do is we have two separate passes for alpha="clip" and alpha="blend" meshbuffers basically |
| 13:36 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> but if a mesh buffer with opaque fragments ends up in the latter pass, it is possible that these opaque fragments become invisible if another "blend" buffer with a smaller depth is rendered first |
| 13:36 |
sfan5 |
solid and transparent pass, yes |
| 13:37 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> if we rendered opaque fragments of transparent things in the solid pass already (rendering transparent things twice), we could avoid this |
| 13:37 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> but i figure it isn't really worth the cost of doubling drawcalls for (semi)transparent things |
| 13:38 |
sfan5 |
hmm |
| 14:49 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #luanti-dev |
| 16:47 |
MTDiscord |
<exe_virus> I'll admit, I tried to use transparent nodes this game jam, and had a cool effect but our defaults meant I had to switch to using particles for the effect. Ironically it came out better, but still another data point |
| 16:57 |
|
turtleman joined #luanti-dev |
| 17:58 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 18:56 |
|
fluxionary joined #luanti-dev |
| 19:13 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 19:40 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 19:48 |
|
mrcheese joined #luanti-dev |
| 20:08 |
sfan5 |
merging #16655, #16694 soon |
| 20:08 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/luanti-org/luanti/issues/16655 -- Refactor skinned mesh weight data structure by appgurueu |
| 20:08 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/luanti-org/luanti/issues/16694 -- Fix fog disable in OpenGL3 renderer by sfan5 |
| 20:44 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 21:33 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 21:51 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 22:12 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 23:00 |
|
mrcheese joined #luanti-dev |
| 23:30 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #luanti-dev |
| 23:32 |
|
panwolfram joined #luanti-dev |
