| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:11 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 00:40 |
|
imi joined #luanti-dev |
| 04:26 |
|
Alias joined #luanti-dev |
| 05:00 |
|
MTDiscord joined #luanti-dev |
| 06:29 |
|
alek13 joined #luanti-dev |
| 10:14 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #luanti-dev |
| 10:17 |
|
SpaceMan1ac joined #luanti-dev |
| 13:08 |
|
Desour joined #luanti-dev |
| 15:59 |
|
Desour joined #luanti-dev |
| 16:28 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 17:36 |
|
crazylad joined #luanti-dev |
| 18:18 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 18:25 |
MTDiscord |
<herowl> @luatic re param3 out of band: we surely need a better implementation for the drawtype "submerged" present in a PR |
| 18:27 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 18:35 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 18:37 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 18:40 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 18:40 |
|
crazylad joined #luanti-dev |
| 19:58 |
|
izzyb joined #luanti-dev |
| 20:06 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 20:15 |
|
lhofhansl joined #luanti-dev |
| 20:17 |
lhofhansl |
Re: My question fro yesterday... I added some simple code to track the number of meshes and the the numbers of buffers. In my case there are no object/entities, and all block meshes have a single buffer (all the meshes of all blocks touched in ClientMap::touchMapBlocks), and yet there are many more hw buffers then mesh buffers, which does not seem to make sense. |
| 20:18 |
lhofhansl |
Is anyone aware of a reason why that might be the case - before I spent more time on it? |
| 20:18 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 20:19 |
sfan5 |
transparency sorting |
| 20:21 |
lhofhansl |
ACK |
| 20:23 |
lhofhansl |
I already have transparency_sorting_distance set to 0, though. |
| 20:24 |
sfan5 |
dunno then |
| 20:26 |
sfan5 |
https://github.com/luanti-org/luanti/blob/73aba2e1f058868ad03340086a4429a00af3d43e/src/client/mapblock_mesh.cpp#L887-L905 but actually that can still create multiple buffers |
| 20:26 |
sfan5 |
also mesh_buffer_min_vertices will create lots of buffers on the fly |
| 20:27 |
lhofhansl |
I find that hw-buffers is suspiciously close to the 2 x the number of loaded buffers. |
| 20:27 |
lhofhansl |
I have mesh_buffer_min_vertices set to 0 as well (it seemed to hurt performance on my machine) |
| 20:27 |
sfan5 |
vertex and index buffers count as separate |
| 20:28 |
lhofhansl |
Ah. That would explain it. |
| 20:35 |
lhofhansl |
Any thoughts on #16945? Brings back a pretty good optimization that I had revert... Based on the observation that "close" events should never be considered "low priority". (That leaves the server to finish the current send-blocks loop instead of interrupting it.) |
| 20:35 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/luanti-org/luanti/issues/16945 -- Bring back low priority block events in a safe way. by lhofhansl |
| 20:37 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 22:20 |
|
loggingbot_ joined #luanti-dev |
| 22:20 |
|
Topic for #luanti-dev is now Luanti (fka Minetest) core development and maintenance. Chit chat goes to #luanti. https://dev.luanti.org/ https://irc.luanti.org/ https://github.com/luanti-org |
| 23:19 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 23:39 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #luanti-dev |
| 23:53 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti-dev |
| 23:58 |
|
sofar joined #luanti-dev |
