| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:09 |
|
kyle56 joined #luanti-dev |
| 00:10 |
|
kyle56 left #luanti-dev |
| 01:24 |
|
ShadowBot joined #luanti-dev |
| 01:24 |
|
ShadowNinja joined #luanti-dev |
| 01:43 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #luanti-dev |
| 03:50 |
|
AliasStillTaken joined #luanti-dev |
| 04:00 |
|
MTDiscord joined #luanti-dev |
| 18:11 |
|
crazylad joined #luanti-dev |
| 18:11 |
|
crazylad joined #luanti-dev |
| 18:11 |
sfan5 |
merging #17094 in 15m |
| 18:11 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/luanti-org/luanti/issues/17094 -- [no sq] Misc fixes/changes by sfan5 |
| 19:21 |
[MatrxMT] |
<Zughy> sfan5: I thought I wasn't the one supposed to bump the protocol, hence I've always reset it before committing in my PR |
| 19:23 |
[MatrxMT] |
<Zughy> my other PR relying on a protocol bump didn't change it and nobody complained so... confusing input. Is it written anywhere when to bump? |
| 20:17 |
sfan5 |
i don't think so |
| 20:17 |
sfan5 |
I expect a PR that requires a protocol bump to perform this bump, otherwise the feature remains unusable in dev versions and there's also the risk that the implementation isn't actually tested until last minute |
| 20:18 |
sfan5 |
haven't heard of intentionally delaying the bump before |
| 21:12 |
sofar |
I had a PR with a proto bump in it, but Krock told me to drop it (sorry, throwing you under the bus =)) |
| 22:32 |
|
panwolfram joined #luanti-dev |
| 23:02 |
|
calculon joined #luanti-dev |
| 23:25 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #luanti-dev |
