| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 02:22 |
|
erbium joined #luanti-dev |
| 04:00 |
|
MTDiscord joined #luanti-dev |
| 08:48 |
|
chripo joined #luanti-dev |
| 13:40 |
|
turtleman joined #luanti-dev |
| 15:57 |
|
erbium joined #luanti-dev |
| 15:58 |
|
erbium joined #luanti-dev |
| 18:15 |
Krock |
Will merge #17127 and #17235 in 20 minutes |
| 18:15 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/luanti-org/luanti/issues/17127 -- [no sq] Collision: Update position based on collisionbox faces by SmallJoker |
| 18:15 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/luanti-org/luanti/issues/17235 -- Document world.mt metadata usage by dannyward630 |
| 18:18 |
sfan5 |
take #17286 too |
| 18:18 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/luanti-org/luanti/issues/17286 -- Remove non-existing setting from docs by buti1021 |
| 18:25 |
Krock |
sure |
| 18:26 |
Krock |
actually... should I? Is the readonly map even usable without a specific connection setting? |
| 18:27 |
Krock |
I assume that each map source needs its own PostgreSQL connection setting |
| 18:28 |
sfan5 |
it doesn't look like we correctly implement reading of "pgsql_readonly_connection" if someone wants to use pq as a readonly backend |
| 18:29 |
Krock |
yes, so instead of removing the documentation I would prefer to see it implemented. It would be trivial, after all. |
| 18:29 |
sfan5 |
https://x0.at/GeQI.txt (last one is for the error message only) |
| 18:29 |
sfan5 |
well sure |
| 18:29 |
sfan5 |
I was just thinking if nobody bothers with the trivial implementation then we also shouldn't leave the incorrect docs up |
| 18:30 |
Krock |
\_(ツ)_/¯ |
| 18:33 |
Krock |
anyway. will merge the PR. maybe someone will undo that later if they see the need for a readonly postgresql map feature |
| 18:36 |
Krock |
- done - |
