| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 04:00 |
|
MTDiscord joined #luanti-dev |
| 04:25 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #luanti-dev |
| 04:33 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #luanti-dev |
| 08:03 |
|
Panquesito7_ joined #luanti-dev |
| 09:20 |
|
[MatrxMT] joined #luanti-dev |
| 09:20 |
|
[MatrxMT] joined #luanti-dev |
| 10:37 |
MTDiscord |
<herowl> @luatic |
| 11:17 |
sfan5 |
@paradust do you plan to open a PR for that irrlicht thing? |
| 11:40 |
MTDiscord |
<paradust> sfan5: I was planning to, but I think it is a low priority compared to some other issues I am looking at. I am working on a PR for these, also found by AI: https://luanti.dustlabs.io/netbugs.txt |
| 11:43 |
sfan5 |
as long as it won't cause any regressions |
| 11:46 |
sfan5 |
working on our broken netcode is kind of a waste of time. it should be replaced entirely |
| 11:49 |
pgimeno |
"Net effect: effectively no congestion control; on a lossy link the window ramps to 2048 and stays there, generating retransmit storms that make lag worse." |
| 11:49 |
pgimeno |
Sounds like an accurate description of what's been wrong with Minetest and later Luanti for... ever? |
| 11:50 |
MTDiscord |
<paradust> I was thinking that. Something like kcp (https://github.com/skywind3000/kcp/) or enet (https://github.com/lsalzman/enet) could be a drop-in ARQ replacement, without changing the actual protocol. |
| 11:51 |
MTDiscord |
<paradust> But I was thinking a minimal change would be more likely to be accepted than a large PR like that |
| 11:52 |
sfan5 |
sure, having those bug fixes is still good |
| 11:53 |
MTDiscord |
<sheriff_u3> Could always open an issue to get some discussion on replacing it though. |
| 11:54 |
sfan5 |
we had discussions on replacing it already. the main takeway is that we should also use this opportunity to add encryption. see also the QUIC PR |
| 11:58 |
sfan5 |
if that wasn't the case then my favorite would be usrsctp and I probably would have made a PoC already |
| 12:04 |
MTDiscord |
<paradust> I don't really think its a good idea for me to take on a project like that, especially since the QUIC PR has been sitting for 4 months (I assume it is dead). I was just looking for the minimal fix to get the most benefit right away. Attaching extras to it (like protocol changes, encryption, etc) would most certainly kill that effort |
| 12:06 |
sfan5 |
like I said: feel free to send as many bug fixes for netcode as long as it doesn't introduce regressions. having them is still good. |
| 13:30 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> merging #17359 in 10m |
| 13:30 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/luanti-org/luanti/issues/17359 -- HUD inventory: allow separate background by CodingMantisUA |
| 13:31 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> after that i will fall off the face of the earth until september ends due to exams |
| 13:41 |
sfan5 |
good luck |
| 13:42 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> thanks |
| 14:56 |
|
jonadab joined #luanti-dev |
| 16:37 |
|
Panquesito7 joined #luanti-dev |
| 18:40 |
MTDiscord |
<andrey2470t> What about #17523 ? May it be merged now? |
| 18:40 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/luanti-org/luanti/issues/17523 -- Correct positioning of the player camera base when attached by Andrey2470T |
| 18:48 |
|
[MatrxMT] joined #luanti-dev |
| 20:03 |
Krock |
This PR needs at least 2 more approvals before it may be merged. Trivial PRs need 1 approval. |
| 20:38 |
cheapie |
That whole mess is why celevator does the whole thing with attaching the player to another entity and then attaching *that* to the thing it actually wanted to attach to |
