| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:03 |
|
Can0xfBows joined #luanti |
| 01:06 |
|
Gabauti732 joined #luanti |
| 01:08 |
|
Guest83 joined #luanti |
| 01:09 |
Gabauti732 |
=-O |
| 01:18 |
|
Guest83 joined #luanti |
| 01:19 |
|
Gabauti732 left #luanti |
| 01:53 |
|
tzenfore joined #luanti |
| 02:01 |
|
Lminus joined #luanti |
| 02:01 |
|
Lminus joined #luanti |
| 02:17 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
| 03:34 |
|
FileX joined #luanti |
| 03:39 |
|
FileX joined #luanti |
| 03:41 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
| 03:41 |
repetitivestrain |
Would someone consider this proposal? ย https://forum.luanti.org/viewtopic.php?p=446110#p446110 |
| 04:00 |
|
MTDiscord joined #luanti |
| 05:39 |
|
FileX joined #luanti |
| 05:54 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
| 06:37 |
|
jaca122 joined #luanti |
| 06:45 |
|
FileX joined #luanti |
| 06:52 |
|
germ_ joined #luanti |
| 06:58 |
|
FileX joined #luanti |
| 07:19 |
|
Talkless joined #luanti |
| 07:29 |
|
FileX joined #luanti |
| 07:40 |
|
fbievan joined #luanti |
| 08:16 |
|
FileX joined #luanti |
| 08:48 |
|
FileX joined #luanti |
| 08:54 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
| 09:09 |
luatic |
sounds reasonable |
| 09:12 |
luatic |
as an aside: you sir are perhaps the single most compelling reason for moving to codeberg i have seen so far :p |
| 09:13 |
luatic |
i wonder how hard it would be to set up (or write) a bridge bot that just mirrors PRs and issues on a codeberg repo access to github |
| 09:13 |
luatic |
codeberg repo you can access* |
| 09:29 |
[MatrxMT] |
<y5nw> I wonder whether we can move the repo (etc) to Codeberg and mirror to Github for CI |
| 09:34 |
sfan5 |
that would suck without integration that allows you see CI results on codeberg |
| 09:34 |
sfan5 |
also how many ocassional contributors woul we lose by not being on github? |
| 09:34 |
sfan5 |
I don't pretend to have an answer but it's not that easy |
| 09:55 |
|
mrkubax10 joined #luanti |
| 10:09 |
[MatrxMT] |
<birdlover32767> someone REALLY needs to update this channel on matrix |
| 10:09 |
[MatrxMT] |
<birdlover32767> `The official Minetest channel | Latest version: 5.7.0 (2023-04-08) | General, player and modding discussion is on-topic. If in doubt, post here | Responses may take a while, be patient | Rules: https://wiki.minetest.net/IRC#Rules | Development: #minetest-dev | Server list: https://minetest.net/servers | IRC logs: https://irc.minetest.net/minetest` |
| 10:10 |
[MatrxMT] |
<birdlover32767> im sorry but what is Latest version: 5.7.0 (2023-04-08) |
| 10:10 |
[MatrxMT] |
<Blockhead256> wow, I think only ย the third | section | is accurate there |
| 10:11 |
[MatrxMT] |
<leca> Why even place this info in the room desc? |
| 10:11 |
[MatrxMT] |
<leca> I mean the latest version |
| 10:11 |
[MatrxMT] |
<leca> At the very least, we could write a bot that would 'hook' on release and update the ver herer |
| 10:11 |
[MatrxMT] |
<leca> At the very least, we could write a bot that would 'hook' on release and update the ver here |
| 10:11 |
|
User6198 joined #luanti |
| 10:12 |
sfan5 |
for reference the IRC topic is: |
| 10:12 |
sfan5 |
The official Luanti (formerly Minetest) channel | General, player and modding discussion is on-topic. If in doubt, post here | Responses may take a while, be patient | Rules: https://dev.luanti.org/irc/#rules | Development: #luanti-dev | Server list: https://luanti.org/servers | IRC logs: https://irc.luanti.org/ |
| 10:13 |
[MatrxMT] |
<leca> It is more loved by maintainers ๐ |
| 10:14 |
repetitivestrain |
luatic: thanks but i would really prefer to be a bit more demure. ย i trust there are innumerable developers with more time and insight for minetest than i have who are equally frustrated by GitHub |
| 10:20 |
|
lumidify joined #luanti |
| 10:26 |
luatic |
leca: what you suggest sounds a lot like https://xkcd.com/1319/ ๐ |
| 10:30 |
[MatrxMT] |
<leca> Crap, it's like that every time ๐ |
| 10:30 |
[MatrxMT] |
<leca> Sometimes I really wanna automate like a 5-sec task but it costs me DAYS of debugging.. |
| 10:30 |
[MatrxMT] |
<leca> Like I write minimal buggy version for like a few hours and then I stuck in the loop like "oh theres a bug -> debug -> fixed -> oh theres another". |
| 10:30 |
[MatrxMT] |
<leca> But bugs sometimes ends (or I stop noticing them :D) and the new loop starts: "oh theres a tiny little thing that I'd like to improve -> spend hours searching the best ways -> stick with current code 'cause no time or desire left ๐ |
| 10:37 |
[MatrxMT] |
<Blockhead256> it's occurred to me as well before that a bot could be used to send messages to GitHub without being registered. That would: |
| 10:37 |
[MatrxMT] |
<Blockhead256> (a) potentially be against GitHub's ToS or their interests |
| 10:37 |
[MatrxMT] |
<Blockhead256> (b) not be acceptable to a lot of objectors to GitHub anyway |
| 10:38 |
[MatrxMT] |
<Blockhead256> (c) cost a lot to maintain |
| 10:42 |
luatic |
another thought i'd just throw out there: i feel like convincing GH users to use codeberg might be much easier than convincing codeberg users to use GH. |
| 10:43 |
luatic |
codeberg allows auth via GH and the basic workflow (PRs, issues) is the same; a GH user probably won't have reservations about using codeberg. |
| 10:43 |
|
User6198 left #luanti |
| 10:43 |
|
ireallyhateirc joined #luanti |
| 10:50 |
|
FileX joined #luanti |
| 10:53 |
[MatrxMT] |
<birdlover32767 (@birdlover32767:matrix.org)> question: how do you detect item entities in a given area? |
| 10:53 |
[MatrxMT] |
<birdlover32767 (@birdlover32767:matrix.org)> do you use `core.get_objects_inside_radius` |
| 10:54 |
[MatrxMT] |
<Blockhead256> yes |
| 10:54 |
[MatrxMT] |
<Blockhead256> or rather, as recommended in the docs, just objects_inside_radius, which has an iterator |
| 10:55 |
[MatrxMT] |
<leca> Another idea: make two repos, on a codeberg and on the GH and synchronize them. Maybe set some people to be responsible for accepting PRs on GH and ย on the Codeberg and then the two repos would synchronize? |
| 10:55 |
[MatrxMT] |
<leca> Maybe that would introduce some kind of division between devs and really better to say "Luanti is now on Codeberg"... |
| 10:55 |
[MatrxMT] |
<Blockhead256> then filter to `__builtin:item` entities |
| 10:56 |
[MatrxMT] |
<birdlover32767 (@birdlover32767:matrix.org)> then i just get the itemstring field, ok |
| 10:56 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
| 11:02 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
| 11:03 |
|
jaca122 joined #luanti |
| 11:33 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
| 11:48 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
| 11:52 |
|
cheapie_ joined #luanti |
| 11:53 |
|
lmisu joined #luanti |
| 11:57 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
| 12:03 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> moving to codeberg because one person is a zealot hardly seems like a good idea |
| 12:04 |
[MatrxMT] |
<Blockhead256> well this is not the only person who has made a point of not using GitHub, but just the most recent and a prominent example |
| 12:05 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
| 12:16 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
| 12:23 |
|
cheapie_ joined #luanti |
| 12:29 |
|
cheek_pain joined #luanti |
| 12:29 |
|
silverwolf73828 joined #luanti |
| 12:37 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
| 12:57 |
|
SwissalpS joined #luanti |
| 13:06 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
| 13:20 |
pgimeno |
"<sfan5> also how many ocassional contributors woul we lose by not being on github?" ย <- dunno but you'd gain at least one ๐ |
| 13:20 |
pgimeno |
this formula can't be correct: param0[(Z-z)*Z*Y + y*X + x] (from https://docs.luanti.org/for-creators/luanti-schematic-file-format/ ) |
| 13:21 |
pgimeno |
I'm betting for param0[(Z-1-z)*X*Y + y*X + x] |
| 13:30 |
rubenwardy |
we might lose some fly-by contributors but those don't have huge value |
| 13:36 |
luatic |
^ yep, that too. the only major "risk" wrt contributors i see is that the "extra step" of using codeberg alienates fly-by contributors who *would have developed* into established contributors |
| 13:37 |
cheapie |
FWIW Luanti is an important enough project to me that if it was to move I'd create an account on the new service (within reason) |
| 13:46 |
bgstack15 |
Eh, I don't see why a proficient user of github wouldn't also just use codeberg. |
| 13:46 |
bgstack15 |
Codeberg is way less icky than github, albeit with a smaller userbase. |
| 14:10 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
| 14:35 |
sfan5 |
a big part is already having an account set up anyway |
| 14:38 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
| 14:48 |
|
kamdard_ joined #luanti |
| 14:50 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
| 14:59 |
|
turtleman joined #luanti |
| 14:59 |
|
jaca122 joined #luanti |
| 15:19 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
| 15:27 |
|
mrkubax10 joined #luanti |
| 15:28 |
|
Talkless joined #luanti |
| 15:30 |
|
Talkless joined #luanti |
| 15:33 |
|
Talkless joined #luanti |
| 15:35 |
|
Talkless joined #luanti |
| 15:37 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
| 15:54 |
|
Kimapr joined #luanti |
| 15:56 |
|
Kimapr_ joined #luanti |
| 16:05 |
|
Kimapr joined #luanti |
| 17:14 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
| 17:19 |
|
Kimapr_ joined #luanti |
| 17:19 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
| 17:47 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
| 18:12 |
|
SwissalpS joined #luanti |
| 18:21 |
|
Trifton joined #luanti |
| 18:44 |
|
Sokomine joined #luanti |
| 19:01 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
| 19:07 |
|
gregon joined #luanti |
| 19:10 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
| 19:18 |
|
alias joined #luanti |
| 19:45 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
| 19:48 |
|
sys4 joined #luanti |
| 19:55 |
|
mazes_83 joined #luanti |
| 20:07 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
| 20:39 |
|
Kimapr joined #luanti |
| 20:42 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
| 21:30 |
|
repetitivestrai- joined #luanti |
| 21:57 |
|
loggingbot_ joined #luanti |
| 21:57 |
|
Topic for #luanti is now The official Luanti (formerly Minetest) channel | General, player and modding discussion is on-topic. If in doubt, post here | Responses may take a while, be patient | Rules: https://dev.luanti.org/irc/#rules | Development: #luanti-dev | Server list: https://luanti.org/servers | IRC logs: https://irc.luanti.org/ |
| 22:03 |
|
Kimapr_ joined #luanti |
| 22:12 |
|
ireallyhateirc joined #luanti |
| 22:32 |
|
panwolfram joined #luanti |
| 23:05 |
|
Eragon joined #luanti |
| 23:07 |
|
SFENCE joined #luanti |
