| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:00 |
|
kaeza joined #minetest-dev |
| 00:02 |
paramat |
merged 6134 |
| 00:08 |
paramat |
merging game 1828 |
| 00:11 |
paramat |
done |
| 00:16 |
|
soupfly joined #minetest-dev |
| 00:40 |
|
Tmanyo joined #minetest-dev |
| 01:05 |
|
deep-book-gk_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 01:33 |
|
ssieb joined #minetest-dev |
| 01:57 |
|
Hunterz joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:00 |
|
bigfoot547 joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:41 |
|
CalebDavis joined #minetest-dev |
| 03:02 |
|
torgdor joined #minetest-dev |
| 03:45 |
|
elinor joined #minetest-dev |
| 04:15 |
Hijiri |
is player object origin finally being changed to 0? |
| 04:20 |
elinor |
If you run a public server, you probably want to fix this before the next release: https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/issues/1839. A temporary fix is modifying allow_take in games/minetest_game/mods/creative/inventory.lua to https://clbin.com/ZBIBD. |
| 05:11 |
|
elinor joined #minetest-dev |
| 05:51 |
Hijiri |
elinor: you know both 0 and -1 are truthy values in Lua? |
| 05:51 |
elinor |
Yes? |
| 05:51 |
Hijiri |
what is the point of returning -1 and 0 in different branches then? |
| 05:51 |
Hijiri |
oh |
| 05:52 |
Hijiri |
nevermind, I though allow_take returned a boolean |
| 05:52 |
Hijiri |
why is it a temporary solution though (and not a permanent one) |
| 05:52 |
Hijiri |
oh, you mean as not in the upstream code |
| 05:52 |
Hijiri |
okay, nevermind |
| 06:42 |
|
nerzhul joined #minetest-dev |
| 07:22 |
|
Grandolf joined #minetest-dev |
| 07:38 |
|
Hunterz joined #minetest-dev |
| 07:44 |
|
Krock joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:12 |
|
EDAKIRI joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:16 |
|
jin_xi joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:54 |
|
DS-minetest joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:56 |
|
octacian joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:16 |
|
lisac joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:22 |
|
Raven262 joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:24 |
|
karamel joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:33 |
|
jin_xi joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:14 |
karamel |
Hello, I'm thinking about a mod lib to add onmove listeners. I see that some mods like trail uses a look to check pos and if changed trigger something. Is there a way to observe item (and players) positions more elegantly yet? |
| 11:16 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:48 |
Fixer |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/issues/1839 niiiiice |
| 11:54 |
|
Taoki joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:21 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:27 |
|
Krock joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:29 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:44 |
karamel |
Answered myself with issue 247 and walkover mod |
| 13:34 |
|
Hunterz joined #minetest-dev |
| 13:46 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 13:49 |
Krock |
merging game#1838 in 10 mins |
| 13:49 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/issues/1838 -- Correct farming/stairs dependency by Ezhh |
| 14:00 |
|
nerzhul joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:02 |
|
nerzhul joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:02 |
|
nerzhul joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:27 |
|
Hunterz joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:29 |
|
soupfly joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:53 |
|
twoelk joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:00 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:02 |
|
soupfly joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:07 |
|
shalmezad joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:27 |
Krock |
game#1840 needs review |
| 15:27 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/issues/1840 -- Creative: Prevent unauthorized item access by SmallJoker |
| 15:34 |
|
shalmezad joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:56 |
|
soupfly joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:03 |
|
karamel joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:29 |
|
behalebabo joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:54 |
|
octacian_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:55 |
|
paramat joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:03 |
paramat |
Krock rubenwardy sfan5 please could you consider game#1834 ? |
| 17:03 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/issues/1834 -- Improve descriptions by Ezhh |
| 17:07 |
Krock |
This makes the node handling much more complicated. "Sandstone Block" (as example) is descriptive enough |
| 17:20 |
|
soupfly joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:24 |
paramat |
what type of node handling? |
| 17:33 |
Krock |
speaking of ingame: everybody will call it a sandstone block, because they already know what it is |
| 17:36 |
|
bigfoot547 joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:37 |
|
bigfoot547 joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:43 |
paramat |
yeah, but that doesn't stop us making the desciption more descriptive and non-ambiguous |
| 17:49 |
Krock |
IMO, this makes names unnecessary long for no real profit. But seeing more opinions about this topic would be great |
| 17:50 |
paramat |
Krock nerzhul nore rubenwardy sfan5 ShadowBot sofar 'meeting' in 10 mins if anyone's around |
| 17:50 |
Krock |
oh right. it's saturday again. |
| 17:50 |
paramat |
descriptions are harmless, and the advantage is being descriptive and non-generic |
| 17:51 |
|
thePalindrome joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:54 |
paramat |
but yeah, the non-stone changes are the more useful |
| 17:55 |
rubenwardy |
heh, I'm not so keen on grey as a prefix |
| 17:56 |
rubenwardy |
sandstone is fine already |
| 17:56 |
rubenwardy |
what stone is default:stone closest to? |
| 17:56 |
rubenwardy |
it looks like black granite |
| 18:03 |
paramat |
could you add your opinions to game#1235 ? there's discussion but no coding, shall we close it? |
| 18:03 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/issues/1235 -- Character model: use latest Minecraft skin format |
| 18:04 |
paramat |
i think game#1782 could be closed |
| 18:04 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/issues/1782 -- Experience factor |
| 18:06 |
paramat |
seems a specialist thing for optional mods |
| 18:08 |
Krock |
the model we have right now is good enough IMO |
| 18:08 |
Krock |
closing 1782 |
| 18:08 |
|
juhdanad joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:11 |
paramat |
yeah body layers can be done by changing textures, really not sure it's worth coding full body overlays into MTGame |
| 18:11 |
Krock |
rubenwardy, what exactly do you suggest here? https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/pull/1840#discussion_r128900593 |
| 18:11 |
juhdanad |
Hi everybody! |
| 18:11 |
Krock |
o/ juhdanad |
| 18:12 |
rubenwardy |
lool, Krock |
| 18:12 |
rubenwardy |
this is why you check what you type on your phone |
| 18:12 |
rubenwardy |
updated |
| 18:12 |
Krock |
xD already expected such kind of explanation |
| 18:13 |
|
TheReaperKing joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:14 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/issues/1834 -- Improve descriptions by Ezhh |
| 18:14 |
Krock |
corrected the style. merge now? |
| 18:15 |
rubenwardy |
yeah, go ahead |
| 18:15 |
Krock |
(for the case anyone's preparing a push) |
| 18:43 |
Raven262 |
Guys, can you tell me if allfaces drawtype *really* must not support different textures on each face? |
| 18:46 |
paramat |
i suspect different textures per face are fine |
| 18:46 |
paramat |
can't think why not |
| 18:47 |
|
behalebabo joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:47 |
Raven262 |
I thought there is some kind of limitation in the engine. |
| 18:47 |
paramat |
not that i know of (might be wrong) |
| 18:49 |
juhdanad |
There is a limitation, only the first texture is used. |
| 18:50 |
paramat |
any idea why? |
| 18:50 |
juhdanad |
There is no reasin, it is just that way. |
| 18:50 |
juhdanad |
*reason |
| 18:50 |
paramat |
yeah thought so |
| 18:51 |
juhdanad |
same for glasslike and fencelike nodes. |
| 18:51 |
paramat |
it was made for leaves i guess which usuaaly have just 1 texture |
| 18:51 |
paramat |
*usually |
| 18:52 |
Raven262 |
Well, it was kind of limiting me more than a few times when making "stainglass" like nodes. |
| 18:52 |
Raven262 |
I don't think that was thought of when creating the drawtype :P |
| 18:58 |
|
garywhite joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:59 |
|
garywhite joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:04 |
|
torgdor joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:45 |
|
EDAKIRI joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:53 |
paramat |
Krock rubenwardy so for game#1834 you prefer no changes to stone and sandstone? same opinion for 'sand' -> 'golden sand'? but all else is good (appletree woods flowers vessels)? |
| 19:53 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/issues/1834 -- Improve descriptions by Ezhh |
| 19:54 |
Krock |
yes |
| 20:01 |
paramat |
ok |
| 20:01 |
paramat |
that seems reasonable to me too |
| 20:41 |
|
shalmezad joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:47 |
|
Noxarivis[m] left #minetest-dev |
| 21:42 |
|
elinor joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:47 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:50 |
|
twoelk|2 joined #minetest-dev |
| 22:25 |
|
DI3HARD139 joined #minetest-dev |
| 22:26 |
|
shalmezad joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:00 |
|
shalmezad joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:11 |
|
deep-book-gk_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:12 |
|
deep-book-gk_ left #minetest-dev |
| 23:20 |
|
bigfoot547 joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:20 |
|
bigfoot547 left #minetest-dev |
| 23:25 |
|
bigfoot547 joined #minetest-dev |
