| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:58 |
|
lumberJ joined #minetest-dev |
| 01:01 |
|
lumberJ joined #minetest-dev |
| 01:01 |
|
Tmanyo joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:16 |
|
ANAND joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:22 |
|
Tmanyo joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:44 |
|
RKINGLEGEND joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:48 |
|
Tmanyo joined #minetest-dev |
| 04:01 |
|
AntumD joined #minetest-dev |
| 05:44 |
|
ensonic joined #minetest-dev |
| 05:46 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev |
| 06:58 |
|
behalebabo joined #minetest-dev |
| 07:26 |
|
Guest96083 joined #minetest-dev |
| 09:14 |
|
Wuzzy joined #minetest-dev |
| 09:37 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:01 |
|
Fixer_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:52 |
|
VargaD joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:05 |
|
longerstaff13 joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:17 |
|
longerstaff13-m joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:19 |
|
longerstaff13 joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:30 |
|
entuland joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:13 |
|
entuland joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:15 |
|
entuland joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:35 |
|
entuland joined #minetest-dev |
| 13:12 |
|
Krock joined #minetest-dev |
| 13:14 |
Krock |
rubenwardy, so #7462 is a duplicate of your old issue. Is there any reason to use the new in favour of the older issue? |
| 13:14 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7462 -- While Joining Formspecs |
| 13:15 |
rubenwardy |
well yes |
| 13:15 |
rubenwardy |
someone cares about |
| 13:15 |
rubenwardy |
I closed the issue because I no longer cared that much |
| 13:16 |
Krock |
The rules say that the newer duplicate issue should be closed. This means re-opening 2324 |
| 13:17 |
rubenwardy |
the older one didn't really have any conversation |
| 13:40 |
|
entuland joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:00 |
|
entuland joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:02 |
|
behalebabo joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:03 |
|
entuland joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:20 |
|
Beton joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:39 |
|
paramat joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:42 |
paramat |
rubenwardy do you want to keep #6538 open? see my comment https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/6538#issuecomment-380247159 |
| 14:42 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/6538 -- Formspec: Allow 'position[]' anywhere, just like backgrounds |
| 14:43 |
rubenwardy |
no, doesn't matter |
| 14:43 |
rubenwardy |
I'm planning on introducing a new sfinv API |
| 14:43 |
paramat |
ok thanks |
| 14:43 |
rubenwardy |
the sfinv.make_formspec thing is kinda gross |
| 14:44 |
rubenwardy |
instead I'll have it return a table, which can include size and position etc |
| 14:44 |
paramat |
nice. closed |
| 14:46 |
paramat |
#7456 is fairly simple and has a good description, if anyone can look |
| 14:46 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7456 -- Decoration API: Add lightweight ability to have complete coverage by paramat |
| 14:46 |
rubenwardy |
complete code coverage?? :O |
| 14:46 |
rubenwardy |
/s |
| 14:46 |
rubenwardy |
/jk |
| 14:46 |
Krock |
would be a dream if the code was meant lol |
| 14:48 |
rubenwardy |
better than the current 12% |
| 14:49 |
|
entuland joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:10 |
nerzhul |
12%, really ? i thought 5% :) |
| 15:10 |
nerzhul |
at least i continue to add coverage, i hope you can help me to improve it, it prevent regressoin and permit to catch anoying bugs during redaction, sometimes :) |
| 15:14 |
paramat |
#2663 seems like a close, unless i misunderstand? |
| 15:14 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/2663 -- [Request] Improve EnvArgsEnd errors |
| 15:15 |
rubenwardy |
it's still a bug |
| 15:17 |
paramat |
ok :) |
| 15:29 |
|
AntumD joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:21 |
|
ANAND joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:24 |
|
antims joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:41 |
|
entuland joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:41 |
|
Darcidride joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:32 |
|
ManElevation joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:32 |
ManElevation |
heya! i need help with a server issue |
| 17:32 |
ManElevation |
my server is now on ipv6 |
| 17:33 |
ManElevation |
and players without ipv6 cant connect to my server |
| 17:33 |
ManElevation |
how do i make my server support ipv4? |
| 17:33 |
Krock |
bind it to an ipv4 address |
| 17:33 |
ManElevation |
i cant have a ipv4 server because my portfowarding does not allow that anymore |
| 17:34 |
ManElevation |
what do you mean bind it? |
| 17:34 |
Krock |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/blob/master/minetest.conf.example#L1068 |
| 17:34 |
sfan5 |
unless you fiddled with the bind address settings, just using ipv6_server = true should still allow ipv4 clients to connect |
| 17:35 |
Krock |
the gateway/router would still have to redirect the ipv4 address correctly to your server |
| 17:35 |
Krock |
assuming that you're behind a local network, home style. |
| 17:35 |
ManElevation |
i have this 2 enable_ipv6 = true ipv6_server = true |
| 17:36 |
ManElevation |
no because some people are actually connection to my server but people with out a ipv6 cant |
| 17:36 |
sfan5 |
then ipv4 clients should still be able to connect |
| 17:36 |
ManElevation |
so its not on local |
| 17:36 |
Krock |
"Enable/disable running an IPv6 server. An IPv6 server may be restricted to IPv6 clients, depending on system configuration." ~ conf.example file |
| 17:37 |
Krock |
and that's when ipv6_server = true |
| 17:38 |
ManElevation |
ok give me a min ill do some test and ill tell you if it works now |
| 17:38 |
sfan5 |
Krock: while that's technically correct, in practice there will be no system for which that is true |
| 17:39 |
sfan5 |
in fact, this behaviour is specified in the standard https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3493#section-3.7 |
| 17:40 |
sfan5 |
see also https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt -> /proc/sys/net/ipv6/bindv6only |
| 18:15 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:52 |
Krock |
sfan5, thanks for the ACID insight. Something learnt today :) |
| 18:57 |
paramat |
reverting bugfix will merge later tonight #7464 |
| 18:57 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7464 -- Biome dust: Revert fix that added dust to mod structures by paramat |
| 19:01 |
Krock |
so #7392 will be present again? |
| 19:01 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7392 -- Biome dust fails when solid surface falls below mapchunk base |
| 19:14 |
paramat |
yes unfortunately. but i will fix missing water decorations if there is water but no solid nodes in a column |
| 19:15 |
paramat |
if i can think of a way to fix 7392 without making a mess i'll do it, but might be difficult |
| 19:24 |
|
behalebabo joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:30 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:33 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:38 |
|
Player-2 joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:47 |
|
paramat joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:02 |
|
Foz joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:10 |
Krock |
testing game#2126 |
| 20:10 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/issues/2126 -- disallow beds destroying if used by bell07 |
| 20:12 |
|
Lia joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:14 |
Krock |
paramat, is the formspec size, size[8,15] intentional? 8,5 would suffice |
| 20:17 |
rubenwardy |
8 15 won't be good on mobiles |
| 20:17 |
rubenwardy |
Assume landscape |
| 20:18 |
|
Gael-de-Sailly joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:20 |
Krock |
oh right, context is the beds mod, which uses this value since it was added |
| 20:47 |
|
ManElevation_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:50 |
paramat |
erm no idea |
| 21:00 |
paramat |
thanks will merge that tonight |
| 21:01 |
paramat |
in fact now |
| 21:07 |
paramat |
done |
| 21:08 |
paramat |
merging #7464 |
| 21:08 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7464 -- Biome dust: Revert fix that added dust to mod structures by paramat |
| 21:10 |
paramat |
done! |
| 21:13 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:52 |
|
Taoki joined #minetest-dev |
| 22:30 |
|
Taoki joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:33 |
|
paramat joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:39 |
|
Tmanyo joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:59 |
rubenwardy |
game#2152 |
| 23:59 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/issues/2152 -- Add sfinv.set_page_and_show() by rubenwardy |
