| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 01:29 |
|
LoneWolfHT joined #minetest-dev |
| 01:43 |
|
ssieb joined #minetest-dev |
| 01:49 |
|
yohkara joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:17 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:29 |
|
deezl joined #minetest-dev |
| 04:02 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev |
| 04:55 |
|
pauloue joined #minetest-dev |
| 06:32 |
|
ANAND joined #minetest-dev |
| 09:49 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest-dev |
| 09:54 |
|
Wuzzy joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:33 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:51 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:13 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:50 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:24 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:45 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 13:19 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:17 |
|
pauloue joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:34 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:57 |
|
DS-minetest joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:06 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:31 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:36 |
|
LoneWolfHT joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:47 |
|
LoneWolfHT joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:56 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:16 |
|
twoelk joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:20 |
|
tomraceror joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:22 |
tomraceror |
is the translation for mintest german done? |
| 17:07 |
|
Krock joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:10 |
|
DS-minetest_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:48 |
|
Icedream joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:03 |
Krock |
why is there initializeSecurity() and initializeSecurityClient() ?? Both ought to do the same |
| 18:03 |
sfan5 |
do they do the same though? |
| 18:03 |
Krock |
no, debug.traceback for stack backtrace is missing, for example |
| 18:04 |
Krock |
doing side-by-side comparison now |
| 18:06 |
rubenwardy |
Krock: client security needs to be more secure |
| 18:06 |
Krock |
yes, just seen that "io" is locked out |
| 18:07 |
Krock |
still, these functions should be unified due to the amount of shared code |
| 18:07 |
rubenwardy |
I agree |
| 18:07 |
rubenwardy |
the client API should be whitelist based |
| 18:07 |
rubenwardy |
but it's less critical for the server API to be so |
| 18:17 |
Krock |
oh. #8626 is probably caused by incomplete mod loading |
| 18:17 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/8626 -- Can't join server when a message is sent on the server |
| 18:17 |
Krock |
the Lua environment might already be set up, but not builtin |
| 18:17 |
Krock |
since the mod loading only happens after receiving the CSM packet |
| 18:18 |
Krock |
*CSM restrictions packet |
| 18:23 |
Krock |
runCallbacksRaw() +if (m_type == ScriptingType::Client && !getClient()->modsLoaded()) return; |
| 18:23 |
Krock |
this does the trick for me. Crashes no longer occur |
| 18:24 |
Krock |
-> *PR" |
| 18:24 |
rubenwardy |
sounds correct |
| 18:24 |
rubenwardy |
there are other variations of runCallbakcs |
| 18:24 |
rubenwardy |
they may just call the raw version though |
| 18:24 |
Krock |
for example? |
| 18:25 |
rubenwardy |
oh nevermind |
| 18:25 |
rubenwardy |
I was thinking of the enum passed to it |
| 18:30 |
Krock |
testing... |
| 18:34 |
rubenwardy |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/7895#issuecomment-500287136 |
| 18:34 |
rubenwardy |
do people need this for this PR to be merged? |
| 18:37 |
Krock |
oh. looks like CSM's on_client_ready will become useless |
| 18:38 |
twoelk |
just out of interest, why can mods installed on a server crash clients on weak hardware? |
| 18:39 |
Krock |
I don't care whether it's a single commit or not |
| 18:39 |
rubenwardy |
it potentially makes it easier to not introduce makes, however I'd have to redo the PR |
| 18:39 |
Krock |
twoelk: race conditions? yet I didn't observe any |
| 18:39 |
Krock |
take the diff to the original file |
| 18:39 |
Krock |
commit the original file, apply diff. done. |
| 18:40 |
Krock |
there's even a "ignore space changes" option in the web diff |
| 18:40 |
|
BuckarooBanzai5 joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:41 |
rubenwardy |
oh yeah |
| 18:42 |
rubenwardy |
also, pushed a fix to #7895 |
| 18:42 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7895 -- Add luacheck to check builtin by rubenwardy |
| 19:25 |
Krock |
looks good now |
| 19:50 |
|
LoneWolfHT joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:01 |
|
LoneWolfHT left #minetest-dev |
| 20:02 |
|
Lone_Wolf joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:06 |
|
LoneWolfHT joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:15 |
|
ssieb joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:32 |
|
Icedream joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:45 |
|
fwhcat joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:09 |
|
paramat joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:33 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 22:50 |
|
twoelk left #minetest-dev |
| 22:56 |
rubenwardy |
simple PR: #8383 |
| 22:56 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/8383 -- Add formspec styling using a style[] tag by rubenwardy |
| 22:57 |
rubenwardy |
err |
| 22:57 |
rubenwardy |
#8611 |
| 22:57 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/8611 -- Add support for set_formspec_prepend in main menu by rubenwardy |
| 22:57 |
rubenwardy |
actually, if anyone has time reviewing #8524 would be better |
| 22:57 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/8524 -- Add compatible, consistent coordinate system to FormSpecs. by v-rob |
| 23:21 |
|
pauloue joined #minetest-dev |
