| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:34 |
|
Lone_Wolf joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:51 |
|
tyler-2 joined #minetest-dev |
| 03:08 |
tyler-2 |
Hey folks... I have a network with basically no Internet... And I'm setting up a local Minetest server for the kiddoes. I have my DNS server handing out a local IP for `servers.minetest.net` so that local clients don't have to make changes. And I've got `minetest/master-server` running locally too. Oddly this all works great, and clients see my servers. But only for 5 minutes... Looking at Apache log |
| 03:08 |
tyler-2 |
s it seems like the servers are sending START announces, but not UPDATE. I dropped a silly PR to get Minetest to actually say when it was trying to do an ANNOUNCE. I expect if there were a problem with UPDATE announces, I wouldn't be the first to notice. The only thing that comes to mind is whether `dtime` works on a different time-scale or something on a Raspberry Pi... |
| 03:08 |
tyler-2 |
I am trying to drop a PR that logs when `announce` happens for UPDATEs and DELETEs as well as STARTs. |
| 03:09 |
tyler-2 |
But... I don't speak C good and I'm already struggling with string concatenation. But was curious if anyone had a "Oh yeah there's a problem with the server announce code..." moment. I don't see anything conditional to it other than the `dtime` ticks. |
| 04:02 |
|
Taoki joined #minetest-dev |
| 04:03 |
|
fluxflux joined #minetest-dev |
| 04:12 |
|
Kimapr joined #minetest-dev |
| 05:20 |
|
olliy joined #minetest-dev |
| 06:30 |
|
ssieb joined #minetest-dev |
| 06:49 |
|
fluxflux joined #minetest-dev |
| 06:53 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest-dev |
| 07:33 |
|
hecks joined #minetest-dev |
| 07:38 |
|
NetherEran joined #minetest-dev |
| 07:39 |
hecks |
https://a.cockfile.com/VtdDWk_1k.png |
| 07:47 |
|
ssieb joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:00 |
|
ShadowNinja joined #minetest-dev |
| 09:46 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
| 09:58 |
|
erlehmann joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:18 |
|
celeron55 joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:20 |
|
celeron55 joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:25 |
|
Flitzpiepe joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:36 |
tyler-2 |
Dropped a PR that might be helpful in troubleshooting... But... (shrug) i'm mostly clueless. |
| 12:36 |
tyler-2 |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/10177 |
| 12:38 |
sfan5 |
might be useful for debugging but having those log messages every 5 minutes would be annoying in regular use |
| 12:48 |
tyler-2 |
Yeah, if your server was empty your log would just be full of that. |
| 12:49 |
tyler-2 |
Don't suppose there's a debug loglevel or something that would _already_ show when this is happening? |
| 12:51 |
sfan5 |
adding another log message to infostream would be fine |
| 12:51 |
sfan5 |
since that's not visible by default |
| 13:26 |
tyler-2 |
So actionstream instead of infostream/ |
| 13:26 |
tyler-2 |
Er... infostream instead of actionstream? |
| 13:27 |
sfan5 |
yes |
| 13:28 |
|
Taoki joined #minetest-dev |
| 13:28 |
|
Icedream joined #minetest-dev |
| 13:28 |
|
search_social joined #minetest-dev |
| 13:28 |
|
thePalindrome joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:28 |
|
Taoki joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:40 |
tyler-2 |
Alright, maybe fixed that PR. Is there a way to get a running server to dump its dtime? |
| 14:42 |
tyler-2 |
I had set my time scale to 1, with the intention of making the day/night cycles the same as the real world... I'm curious if that also impacts this `dtime` var that is used to trigger the server announce every 300 secs. |
| 14:44 |
|
oiaohm joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:44 |
sfan5 |
it doesn't |
| 15:04 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:14 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:21 |
|
lisac joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:48 |
|
tuedel_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:51 |
rubenwardy |
#9995 |
| 18:51 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/9995 -- ContentDB: Add Update All and download queuing by rubenwardy |
| 18:52 |
|
oiaohm joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:53 |
|
tuedel joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:03 |
rubenwardy |
I'd like the ability to release patch releases for Android only, with less bureaucracy |
| 19:05 |
sfan5 |
we could do patch releases without announcing them separately |
| 19:05 |
sfan5 |
(adding the windows builds really isn't that much work) |
| 19:05 |
rubenwardy |
would they still be tagged? What branch? |
| 19:06 |
sfan5 |
definitely, commits would be on stable-5 |
| 19:06 |
sfan5 |
but must also exist on master |
| 19:06 |
Krock |
backport branch & PR |
| 19:06 |
sfan5 |
that also works |
| 19:06 |
Krock |
like done in 0.4.17(.1). I think that would be the sanest approach to keep track of the changes |
| 19:11 |
|
tuedel_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:12 |
sfan5 |
what I mainly meant by "announcing them separately" is: just edit the existing forum post, perhaps no changelog, don't tweet about it etc |
| 19:14 |
Krock |
changelog would still be helpful, even if just a footer note |
| 19:15 |
Krock |
I'd say that's a general rule whenever the version number increases... if it's trivial for Android to not increase the number (sneaky patch) then it's probably fine |
| 19:16 |
|
tuedel joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:17 |
rubenwardy |
the overhead of releases are: |
| 19:17 |
rubenwardy |
- feature freezes (not a problem with patch releases) |
| 19:17 |
rubenwardy |
- making all the builds (I'd really like this to be done using GitHub actions at some point) |
| 19:17 |
rubenwardy |
- updating things like PPAs and F-Droid (doesn't need to be done if desktop isn't changed) |
| 19:17 |
rubenwardy |
- announcements |
| 19:19 |
Krock |
so sneaky patch it is |
| 20:56 |
|
tuedel_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:57 |
|
reductum joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:06 |
|
tuedel joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:33 |
|
erlehmann joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:42 |
|
absurb joined #minetest-dev |
| 22:06 |
|
H4mlet joined #minetest-dev |
| 22:56 |
|
antims joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:59 |
|
tuedel joined #minetest-dev |
