| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:53 |
|
Wuzzy joined #minetest-dev |
| 01:37 |
sfan5 |
#10819 |
| 01:37 |
sfan5 |
phew |
| 01:37 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10819 -- Rework use_texture_alpha by sfan5 |
| 01:43 |
|
T4im joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:04 |
|
Seirdy joined #minetest-dev |
| 03:30 |
|
tuedel joined #minetest-dev |
| 03:32 |
|
unclouded joined #minetest-dev |
| 03:52 |
|
tezcatli joined #minetest-dev |
| 04:36 |
|
Seirdy joined #minetest-dev |
| 05:00 |
|
MTDiscord joined #minetest-dev |
| 05:20 |
MTDiscord |
<Techy5> Just curiously, why is inventory serialization so verbose? It seems that it could easily be reduced to a single identifier byte for List/Item/Empty/EndInventory, etc., followed by string16s and binary integers as needed. Is it just too minor to warrant a version update? |
| 06:12 |
ryzenda |
Which cpp file handles placing/drawing the individual node blocks for a map/scheme? |
| 06:12 |
ryzenda |
or which file/function |
| 08:00 |
|
ShadowNinja joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:03 |
|
tuedel joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:41 |
|
Fleckenstein joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:57 |
|
olliy joined #minetest-dev |
| 09:44 |
|
calcul0n_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:44 |
sfan5 |
@Techy5 legacy reasons, this could've been replaced with version 5 but nobody bothered, there's many things like that |
| 11:44 |
sfan5 |
ryzenda: client/mapblock_mesh.cpp |
| 11:50 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:37 |
Krock |
inventory serialization must be backwards-compatible to ensure player database compatiblity |
| 13:19 |
|
MTDiscord joined #minetest-dev |
| 13:25 |
MTDiscord |
<srinivas> would it not be possible to provide a one time upgrade script? |
| 13:26 |
MTDiscord |
<srinivas> or it can convert the old form into the new form as and when it "sees" it |
| 13:26 |
MTDiscord |
<srinivas> and be able to interpret both, but prefer the newer form? |
| 13:31 |
Krock |
if even, it would likely be incremental (load from old format, save to new format) |
| 13:33 |
MTDiscord |
<srinivas> but again, it is very much possible |
| 14:49 |
|
MTDiscord joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:21 |
|
olliy joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:02 |
|
olliy_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:03 |
|
Fixer_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:05 |
|
tuedel joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:35 |
|
MTDiscord joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:05 |
|
lhofhansl joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:01 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:12 |
|
GreenXenith joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:36 |
|
homthack joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:58 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:39 |
|
lhofhansl joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:46 |
|
Wuzzy joined #minetest-dev |
| 22:21 |
lhofhansl |
Any more input on #10788 ? |
| 22:21 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10788 -- Add zstd support. by lhofhansl |
| 22:27 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
| 22:34 |
sfan5 |
I wanted to look at it but haven't had time yet |
| 23:22 |
|
lhofhansl joined #minetest-dev |
