| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:06 |
|
v-rob joined #minetest-dev |
| 00:18 |
|
Extex joined #minetest-dev |
| 00:22 |
|
AliasAlreadyTake joined #minetest-dev |
| 00:33 |
|
v-rob joined #minetest-dev |
| 01:01 |
|
fluxionary_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:10 |
|
olliy joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:10 |
|
Evergreen joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:23 |
|
kilbith joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:40 |
MTDiscord |
<exe_virus> Particles are client side, non-deterministic |
| 03:26 |
|
v-rob joined #minetest-dev |
| 03:29 |
|
queria joined #minetest-dev |
| 03:33 |
|
queria joined #minetest-dev |
| 03:49 |
|
Extex joined #minetest-dev |
| 05:00 |
|
MTDiscord joined #minetest-dev |
| 05:40 |
|
v-rob joined #minetest-dev |
| 06:29 |
|
tekakutli joined #minetest-dev |
| 06:56 |
|
CrazyTeacher joined #minetest-dev |
| 07:02 |
CrazyTeacher |
Can anybody tell me how i can set a spwanpoint (to use with "/spawn") in the mintest.conf (or anywhere else) |
| 08:19 |
MTDiscord |
<j45> static_spawnpoint ? |
| 09:24 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:12 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:34 |
|
tech_exorcist joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:34 |
|
tech_exorcist joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:44 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 13:01 |
|
kilbith joined #minetest-dev |
| 13:11 |
|
olliy joined #minetest-dev |
| 13:39 |
|
tech_exorcist joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:00 |
|
Taoki joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:16 |
proller |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/11843 - week is enough mature to merge! |
| 14:29 |
sfan5 |
hah |
| 14:29 |
MTDiscord |
<Sublayer plank> hah |
| 14:37 |
rubenwardy |
proller: under the roadmap policy, that one week is enough to close it |
| 14:38 |
rubenwardy |
I won't be doing that, will leave it to other devs to decide how they want to approach this |
| 14:40 |
|
Taoki joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:40 |
sfan5 |
good idea, that was my strategy too |
| 14:43 |
|
Taoki joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:05 |
|
tech_exorcist joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:23 |
sfan5 |
merging #11670, #11814, #11827 in 10m |
| 16:23 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/11670 -- Remove creative/damage info in Esc/Pause menu by Wuzzy2 |
| 16:23 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/11814 -- Fix URL escaping in content store by sfan5 |
| 16:23 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/11827 -- Disable inventory if player's inventory formspec is blank by rollerozxa |
| 16:26 |
|
ROllerozxa joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:27 |
ROllerozxa |
uh, before #11827 is merged I really need to know if it breaks CSM inventory stuff or not |
| 16:27 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/11827 -- Disable inventory if player's inventory formspec is blank by rollerozxa |
| 16:28 |
sfan5 |
well what exactly is "CSM inventory stuff"? |
| 16:32 |
sfan5 |
if you want the callback to run even if the server has disabled the inventory then you need to move the check |
| 16:32 |
ROllerozxa |
the CSM inventory key callback SmallJoker was talking about |
| 16:32 |
sfan5 |
but other than that there's no effects |
| 16:32 |
ROllerozxa |
yeah |
| 16:33 |
ROllerozxa |
I'll just do that real quick |
| 16:49 |
|
appguru joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:58 |
|
Fleckenstein joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:07 |
|
Extex joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:12 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:26 |
|
tech_exorcist joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:35 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:49 |
|
queria joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:54 |
MTDiscord |
<Warr1024> Does a blank inventory trigger the inventory "quit" submission immediately like closing a non-blank one? That would at least be a cheap way to keep the protocols similar but then allow the inventory key to be used as a custom binding on the server side. |
| 17:54 |
Krock |
there's no formspec opened to listen to a close event, hence it's never closed. "quit" is missing. |
| 17:55 |
Krock |
feel free to submit a new issue |
| 17:55 |
Krock |
note that this is for CSM only, anyway. |
| 17:58 |
MTDiscord |
<Warr1024> I would like to be able to detect when a user opens the inventory server-side. I think there are already issues for it, though of course no consensus on how it should work. I only noticed that this was a good complement to such a thing, and would be a nice way to sneak in something usable and skip the bikeshedding ? |
| 17:59 |
MTDiscord |
<Warr1024> This particular change is probably good as it is already though. |
| 18:04 |
|
Fleckenstein joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:26 |
|
Fleckenstein joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:11 |
|
tech_exorcist joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:34 |
MTDiscord |
<josiah_wi> #11641 |
| 19:34 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/11641 -- fix integer overflow in mapgen by JosiahWI |
| 20:23 |
|
tech_exorcist joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:27 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:03 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:09 |
|
v-rob joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:20 |
|
Taoki joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:25 |
|
IniKiwi joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:25 |
IniKiwi |
helllooooooooooooooooo |
| 21:26 |
IniKiwi |
... |
| 21:26 |
|
IniKiwi left #minetest-dev |
| 21:36 |
|
v-rob joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:44 |
|
Extex joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:56 |
sfan5 |
quick question, would anyone disagree with dropping gcc-4 support? |
| 21:58 |
sfan5 |
oh and clang < 3.9 too, it's close to impossible to actually verify if it works |
| 22:35 |
|
Extex joined #minetest-dev |
