| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:18 |
|
ShadowBot joined #minetest-dev |
| 00:26 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 01:37 |
|
lhofhansl joined #minetest-dev |
| 05:00 |
|
MTDiscord joined #minetest-dev |
| 06:06 |
|
Noisytoot joined #minetest-dev |
| 06:21 |
|
v-rob joined #minetest-dev |
| 07:59 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:34 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:07 |
|
pmp-p joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:46 |
|
appguru joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:40 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:45 |
|
Niklp2 joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:54 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:47 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:53 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:01 |
|
fluxionary joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:46 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:20 |
|
appguru joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:45 |
|
v-rob joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:52 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:57 |
|
appguru joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:58 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> @grorp i'd merge #13328 in 10m if you're fine with it now |
| 17:58 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/13328 -- Add wear bar color API by techno-sam |
| 18:04 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:06 |
MTDiscord |
<grorp> hmm, so I'm not sure whether "wear" vs "durability" is actually that important, it just triggers me because it's inconsistent with the rest of the Minetest API |
| 18:07 |
MTDiscord |
<grorp> what do you think about this? |
| 18:08 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> I don't have strong feelings either way. I think durability is slightly more intuitive and wear was a mistake to begin with, but as long as either option is documented clearly, I'm fine with it. |
| 18:08 |
MTDiscord |
<jordan4ibanez> I think it should be, one, or the other, because I've used that, and even your reminder that exists, I still can't remember which does what |
| 18:10 |
MTDiscord |
<grorp> yeah, I'm not saying that wear is better, I'm arguing that Minetest has decided for wear and now we should stick with it |
| 18:11 |
MTDiscord |
<grorp> but since a version based on durability is already implemented, it could be smarter to just document it properly and move on |
| 18:14 |
MTDiscord |
<grorp> could you confirm that my definition of durability (1.0 - (wear / 65535)) is correct? then I'd add it to lua_api.md in the PR and remove "Action/change needed" |
| 18:21 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:39 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:52 |
|
v-rob joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:44 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> Yes, that is correct. If you want to emphasize the f32 types, write it as 1.0f - (wear / 65535.0f) (C++), otherwise I'd write it as 1 - (wear / 65535) (Lua). |
| 20:07 |
MTDiscord |
<grorp> @Lars done. |
| 20:09 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> Alright, merging in 10m then |
| 20:58 |
Krock |
will merge #13937 and #14317 in 15 minutes |
| 20:58 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/13937 -- Add help formspec for CSM commands by zmv7 |
| 20:58 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/14317 -- RemotePlayer: make peer ID always reflect the validity of PlayerSAO by SmallJoker |
| 21:04 |
|
grorp joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:13 |
Krock |
merge done |
| 21:33 |
|
v-rob joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:37 |
|
lhofhansl joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:38 |
lhofhansl |
If anybody knows anything about, MSAA, multi-sample textures, and Irrlicht, please comment on #14338 |
| 21:38 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/14338 -- Allow disabling the post processing pipeline by lhofhansl |
| 21:53 |
|
vampirefrog joined #minetest-dev |
| 22:38 |
|
book` joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:18 |
|
fluxionary joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:29 |
|
Niklp joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:34 |
|
panwolfram joined #minetest-dev |
