| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:37 |
|
illwieckz joined #minetest |
| 00:42 |
|
Lone_Wolf joined #minetest |
| 00:43 |
|
NoctisLabs joined #minetest |
| 00:43 |
MinetestBot |
NoctisLabs: Oct-04 08:46 UTC <tumeninodes> https://forum.minetest.net/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=22349&hilit=k_smallblocks |
| 01:24 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest |
| 01:40 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest |
| 01:42 |
|
Glorfindel left #minetest |
| 01:46 |
|
riff-IRC joined #minetest |
| 01:50 |
|
illwieckz joined #minetest |
| 01:51 |
|
riff-IRC joined #minetest |
| 01:56 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest |
| 02:35 |
|
BurningPrincess joined #minetest |
| 02:46 |
|
fluxflux_ joined #minetest |
| 04:06 |
|
Lia joined #minetest |
| 04:06 |
|
Lia joined #minetest |
| 04:07 |
NoctisLabs |
In theory, how many players can be on a single server max? |
| 04:19 |
epoch |
somewhere less than 2**32 billion probably |
| 04:19 |
epoch |
s/billion// |
| 04:19 |
epoch |
the ulimit for max amount of open file descriptors per process might be the first thing to hit |
| 04:20 |
epoch |
on my computer it is set to 1024 |
| 04:21 |
epoch |
I'm not sure if minetest keeps a file descriptor per "connection" since it goes over udp. |
| 04:24 |
epoch |
looks like it doesn't |
| 04:25 |
epoch |
it only uses a single socket file descriptor and then uses recvfrom() to get the IP and port the data came from |
| 04:29 |
epoch |
looks like the data structure used to store clients uses an unsigned 16 bit integer as the key |
| 04:29 |
epoch |
so max limit from that part of the code is 65536 |
| 04:30 |
epoch |
typedef std::unordered_map<u16, RemoteClient*> RemoteClientMap; |
| 04:30 |
epoch |
line 423 in clientiface.h |
| 06:04 |
|
CWz joined #minetest |
| 06:19 |
|
TomTom joined #minetest |
| 06:51 |
NoctisLabs |
Sorry, I mean concurrent players. |
| 06:59 |
|
majochup joined #minetest |
| 07:51 |
|
Persi joined #minetest |
| 08:30 |
|
jluc joined #minetest |
| 08:39 |
|
ShadowNinja joined #minetest |
| 08:43 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest |
| 08:51 |
|
nowhere_man joined #minetest |
| 09:10 |
|
Krock joined #minetest |
| 09:10 |
|
Volgaar joined #minetest |
| 09:17 |
|
FreeFull joined #minetest |
| 09:19 |
|
Fusl joined #minetest |
| 09:29 |
|
ensonic joined #minetest |
| 10:06 |
|
AndDT joined #minetest |
| 10:09 |
|
Pie-jacker875 joined #minetest |
| 10:10 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest |
| 11:04 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest |
| 11:26 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest |
| 11:39 |
|
riff-IRC joined #minetest |
| 11:47 |
epoch |
< NoctisLabs> Sorry, I mean concurrent players. |
| 11:47 |
epoch |
I know what you meant. |
| 11:48 |
epoch |
I have no idea what a realistic limit on concurrent players is |
| 11:48 |
epoch |
but I found a hard upper limit of 65536 |
| 11:50 |
epoch |
you could try flooding a server you run with "new connection" packets |
| 11:50 |
epoch |
then see when it crashes |
| 11:53 |
epoch |
I doubt there's any hard limit below 65536 |
| 11:58 |
BurningPrincess |
How do I save a copy of the map or part of a map localy? |
| 11:59 |
BurningPrincess |
Not sure if that is even possable though |
| 12:01 |
calcul0n |
BurningPrincess, there's a setting for that : saving map received from server |
| 12:01 |
calcul0n |
but you will only get the parts that you have visited |
| 12:01 |
|
bwarden joined #minetest |
| 12:02 |
BurningPrincess |
That works just fine |
| 12:02 |
BurningPrincess |
Thank you calcul0n |
| 12:03 |
|
Milan[m] joined #minetest |
| 12:05 |
BurningPrincess |
Where would I find that settings wise on minetest 0.4.x ? |
| 12:06 |
calcul0n |
i think it's the same |
| 12:06 |
BurningPrincess |
I am not sure where to find it in the settings list |
| 12:10 |
calcul0n |
the technical name on mt5 is enable_local_map_saving |
| 12:10 |
calcul0n |
i don't think it changed since 0.4 but i'm not sure |
| 12:12 |
BurningPrincess |
calcul0n: Thabnk you foir being so helpful |
| 12:27 |
BurningPrincess |
would the local map save overwrite the existing file/database where it is stored locay or would I need to change the name of whatev er file/database its stored to? |
| 12:29 |
BurningPrincess |
As I wanted to save a worksites area with builds, but those builds are still being built so I would have to save it localy quite often to have the latest verson of the builds |
| 12:30 |
calcul0n |
iirc it is stored in a dir named after the server ip so you get a different one for each server |
| 12:34 |
|
Quiark joined #minetest |
| 12:34 |
|
Pseudonosaur joined #minetest |
| 12:34 |
|
magician[m] joined #minetest |
| 12:34 |
|
CopenBra[m] joined #minetest |
| 12:34 |
|
bhree[m] joined #minetest |
| 12:34 |
|
kollaps[m] joined #minetest |
| 12:34 |
|
codic joined #minetest |
| 12:34 |
|
JBB[m] joined #minetest |
| 12:34 |
|
xose[m] joined #minetest |
| 12:34 |
|
kasbah[m] joined #minetest |
| 12:35 |
|
Guest15491 joined #minetest |
| 12:35 |
|
Wysteriary[m] joined #minetest |
| 12:35 |
|
opal[m] joined #minetest |
| 12:35 |
|
raymoo[m] joined #minetest |
| 12:35 |
|
dargo123[m] joined #minetest |
| 12:35 |
|
nalkri joined #minetest |
| 12:35 |
|
MayeulC_backup joined #minetest |
| 12:35 |
|
tuxayo[m] joined #minetest |
| 12:35 |
|
rendeko[m] joined #minetest |
| 12:35 |
|
nyanredice[m] joined #minetest |
| 12:35 |
|
snek joined #minetest |
| 12:35 |
|
ssorbom[m] joined #minetest |
| 12:35 |
|
nri joined #minetest |
| 12:35 |
|
Corey[m] joined #minetest |
| 12:35 |
|
wowaname joined #minetest |
| 12:35 |
|
SAMIAMNOT joined #minetest |
| 12:35 |
|
BluedelaOof[m] joined #minetest |
| 12:35 |
|
gsbhasin84 joined #minetest |
| 12:38 |
BurningPrincess |
Would new chunks saved to it overwrite old ones? |
| 12:39 |
calcul0n |
yes |
| 12:40 |
BurningPrincess |
Thank you so much. This channel is very helpfu; |
| 12:40 |
calcul0n |
but it was a bit buggy when i used it, sometimes it only saves the map when it's loaded twice |
| 12:40 |
calcul0n |
i don't know if it has been fixed |
| 12:41 |
BurningPrincess |
Well, I can aways fly back and foth a few times to make sure |
| 12:41 |
calcul0n |
yep |
| 13:04 |
|
fluxflux_ joined #minetest |
| 13:06 |
|
Wuzzy joined #minetest |
| 13:06 |
|
majochup joined #minetest |
| 13:18 |
|
fluxflux_ joined #minetest |
| 13:31 |
|
Unit193 joined #minetest |
| 13:44 |
|
Darcidride joined #minetest |
| 13:50 |
Wuzzy |
Who is responsible for moving threads of mods/games to Mod Releases/Game Releases? https://forum.minetest.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=10418 |
| 13:51 |
sfan5 |
evidently, nobody |
| 13:51 |
Wuzzy |
who moved them previously? |
| 13:56 |
sfan5 |
any of the forum moderators |
| 14:02 |
|
fluxflux joined #minetest |
| 14:16 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest |
| 14:20 |
|
nowhere_man joined #minetest |
| 14:44 |
|
Volgaar joined #minetest |
| 15:00 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest |
| 15:16 |
|
majochup joined #minetest |
| 15:26 |
* Ingar |
builds 5.0.1 server |
| 15:29 |
* rubenwardy |
suggests trying 5.1.0-rc1 |
| 15:30 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest |
| 15:31 |
Ingar |
well, git stable-5 branch actually |
| 15:33 |
Krock |
bUILd fRoM mAsTeR pLeaSe |
| 15:34 |
kurtzmusch |
anyone knows if there was any attempt at making submerged nodeboxes without bubbles? |
| 15:34 |
kurtzmusch |
i couldnt ifnd any issue tagged as feature request with this |
| 15:34 |
kurtzmusch |
and yeah, im aware of plantlike rooted |
| 15:35 |
Krock |
then you know that plantlike rooted only doesn't have bubbles because it's the node below that has an extended mesh |
| 15:35 |
Krock |
it extends upwards, into water |
| 15:35 |
kurtzmusch |
yes |
| 15:36 |
Krock |
to make submerged nodes possible would require water to extend into nodeboxes |
| 15:36 |
kurtzmusch |
i know, but i wanted to know if a discussion exists about doing it in a 'non hacky way' |
| 15:36 |
kurtzmusch |
or at least a less hacky way |
| 15:38 |
Krock |
discussion as in feature request? yes sure there is |
| 15:38 |
kurtzmusch |
yes |
| 15:38 |
kurtzmusch |
i went through all of the issues tagged with feature request |
| 15:39 |
kurtzmusch |
couldnt find anything, only the plantlike-rooted |
| 15:40 |
Krock |
#4869 |
| 15:40 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/4869 -- allow water to cross specific node groups |
| 15:40 |
Krock |
#3704 |
| 15:40 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/3704 -- Rendering issue on nodebox below water |
| 15:42 |
kurtzmusch |
nice, thanks |
| 15:42 |
Krock |
also #3074 |
| 15:42 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/3074 -- Allow to define a nodebox (or some sort of "overflow") for fluids. |
| 15:44 |
kurtzmusch |
yes,i just saw this one now |
| 15:44 |
kurtzmusch |
weird, i went trough all of them yesterday and didnt find the last 2 |
| 15:46 |
sfan5 |
hmm |
| 15:46 |
sfan5 |
I don't think that issue should've been closed just because you can use an ugly workaround |
| 15:47 |
kurtzmusch |
oh, thats because the issue was closed |
| 15:47 |
kurtzmusch |
#3074 should be opened |
| 15:47 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/3074 -- Allow to define a nodebox (or some sort of "overflow") for fluids. |
| 15:48 |
sfan5 |
it's not actually that non-trivial either, the water could be visually extended into the other node depending on the defined nodebox |
| 15:49 |
kurtzmusch |
i think a new drawtype: nodebox-floodable could be usedm the engine then checks if the node has liquid-source above it and skips generating the liquid mesh around it |
| 15:50 |
sfan5 |
no need for a new drawtype |
| 15:50 |
kurtzmusch |
the problem is: we can have multiple liquids, so we cant program a fixed behaviour for when the player is inside node, wich means its still an air buble |
| 15:51 |
Ingar |
oh well, I broke it :D |
| 15:52 |
kurtzmusch |
MC seems to transforms its blocks into another type wich is a nodebox but also a liquid-source |
| 16:06 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest |
| 16:20 |
|
Enricoo joined #minetest |
| 16:23 |
|
Nullsrc joined #minetest |
| 16:25 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest |
| 16:35 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest |
| 16:41 |
|
Volgaar joined #minetest |
| 16:48 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest |
| 16:52 |
|
ensonic joined #minetest |
| 17:17 |
|
majochup joined #minetest |
| 17:18 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest |
| 17:24 |
|
ensonic joined #minetest |
| 17:38 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest |
| 17:45 |
|
jluc joined #minetest |
| 17:53 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest |
| 18:01 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest |
| 18:07 |
|
hashtag_code1 joined #minetest |
| 18:17 |
|
hashtag_code joined #minetest |
| 18:19 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest |
| 18:19 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest |
| 18:31 |
|
ensonic joined #minetest |
| 18:41 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest |
| 18:58 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest |
| 19:01 |
|
cdde joined #minetest |
| 19:17 |
|
Pie-jacker875 joined #minetest |
| 19:29 |
|
Lymkwi joined #minetest |
| 19:40 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest |
| 19:52 |
|
puzzlecube joined #minetest |
| 20:04 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest |
| 20:05 |
BurningPrincess |
How much ram and cpu would a 20 person server use? |
| 20:05 |
sfan5 |
depends on how heavy the mods you use are |
| 20:05 |
sfan5 |
4 cores + 4 gb can go a long way |
| 20:06 |
BurningPrincess |
Thank you |
| 20:08 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest |
| 20:19 |
|
xSmurf joined #minetest |
| 20:24 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest |
| 20:35 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest |
| 20:39 |
|
Gael-de-Sailly joined #minetest |
| 20:42 |
|
EnricoXL joined #minetest |
| 20:43 |
|
illwieckz joined #minetest |
| 20:55 |
|
wyre joined #minetest |
| 20:59 |
wyre |
do you think minetest could be as bigger as minecraft in a future? |
| 20:59 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest |
| 21:01 |
sfan5 |
probably not |
| 21:02 |
|
frostsnow joined #minetest |
| 21:11 |
|
nri joined #minetest |
| 21:11 |
|
nri joined #minetest |
| 21:15 |
wyre |
sfan5: why? |
| 21:15 |
wyre |
mojang resources? |
| 21:16 |
sfan5 |
yes, there's far more resources behind minecraft and it just has more and better features |
| 21:17 |
|
wyre joined #minetest |
| 21:18 |
wyre |
sfan5: well, maybe is a money thing |
| 21:18 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest |
| 21:28 |
|
Markow joined #minetest |
| 21:31 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest |
| 21:47 |
|
Unit193 joined #minetest |
| 21:52 |
calcul0n |
maybe we should define bigger here |
| 21:52 |
calcul0n |
minetest is free and has a nice community, this is priceless |
| 22:09 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest |
| 22:24 |
|
nepugia joined #minetest |
| 22:33 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest |
| 22:35 |
|
nowhere_man joined #minetest |
| 22:39 |
|
frostsnow joined #minetest |
| 22:44 |
|
loggingbot_ joined #minetest |
| 22:44 |
|
Topic for #minetest is now The official Minetest channel | Latest version: 5.0.1 (2019-03-31) | General, player and modder discussion is on-topic. If in doubt, post here | Responses may take a while, be patient | Rules: https://wiki.minetest.net/IRC#Rules | Development: #minetest-dev | Server list: https://minetest.net/servers | IRC logs: http://irc.minetest.net/minetest |
| 22:45 |
|
lisac_ joined #minetest |
| 22:52 |
|
NoctisLabs joined #minetest |
| 23:08 |
nepugia |
Is there a way to use the L-tree system for the mapgen? i found a call to just spawn trees with it normally, but not to integrate it with the mapgenerator |
| 23:13 |
kurtzmusch |
you can call it on the on_generated, i guess? |
| 23:14 |
kurtzmusch |
minetest.register_on_generated( function() minetest.spawntree() end ) |
| 23:22 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest |
| 23:26 |
|
MinetestBot joined #minetest |
| 23:27 |
|
nepugia joined #minetest |
| 23:34 |
kurtzmusch |
running minetest --server wont use the configs from minetest.conf, what do i do? |
| 23:41 |
|
Taoki joined #minetest |
| 23:57 |
|
nowhereman joined #minetest |
