| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:32 |
|
sys4 joined #luanti |
| 00:33 |
|
fling joined #luanti |
| 00:33 |
|
est31 joined #luanti |
| 03:55 |
|
sy joined #luanti |
| 04:00 |
|
MTDiscord joined #luanti |
| 04:24 |
|
jimc1827 joined #luanti |
| 05:08 |
|
sys4 joined #luanti |
| 05:22 |
|
sparky4 joined #luanti |
| 06:09 |
|
GNUHacker joined #luanti |
| 06:30 |
|
FeXoR joined #luanti |
| 06:36 |
|
SwissalpS joined #luanti |
| 07:19 |
|
Juri joined #luanti |
| 07:19 |
|
Niklp joined #luanti |
| 07:42 |
|
sy joined #luanti |
| 07:56 |
|
FeXoR joined #luanti |
| 08:18 |
|
crabycowman123 joined #luanti |
| 08:22 |
|
Warr1024 joined #luanti |
| 08:39 |
|
crabycowman123 joined #luanti |
| 08:47 |
|
Warr1024 joined #luanti |
| 09:01 |
|
dudz joined #luanti |
| 09:52 |
|
FeXoR joined #luanti |
| 10:18 |
|
mrkubax10 joined #luanti |
| 10:19 |
|
mrkubax10 joined #luanti |
| 12:07 |
|
PoochInquisitor joined #luanti |
| 12:07 |
|
sparky4 joined #luanti |
| 13:19 |
Krock |
Blockhead256: Re: toolranks. There is yet no response from lisacvuk after about 1.5 months. Is that sufficient time? |
| 13:28 |
|
peterz joined #luanti |
| 14:03 |
|
chilledfrogs joined #luanti |
| 14:06 |
|
Desour joined #luanti |
| 14:10 |
|
osin joined #luanti |
| 14:11 |
|
chilledfrogs joined #luanti |
| 14:24 |
|
chilledfrogs joined #luanti |
| 14:36 |
|
TenPlus1 joined #luanti |
| 14:36 |
MinetestBot |
TenPlus1: Mar-14 22:03 UTC <MTDiscord> retried again today, PPAs should be updated now |
| 14:36 |
MinetestBot |
TenPlus1: May-10 08:18 UTC <Krock> https://krock-works.uk.to/u/git-rebase/ |
| 14:36 |
TenPlus1 |
Hi folks |
| 14:38 |
TenPlus1 |
We got any ContentDB moderators in today ? |
| 14:40 |
|
chilledfrogs joined #luanti |
| 14:41 |
Krock |
I do have the permissions to manipulate stuff, though am not strictly speaking part of the moderation team |
| 14:41 |
Krock |
also hi :) consider me available if there's none other who's better versed than me |
| 14:41 |
TenPlus1 |
hi Krock, was just wondering if it's possible to push a release for a mod that's outdated and the author seems to have abandoned it |
| 14:41 |
TenPlus1 |
without having to repost it |
| 14:42 |
Krock |
https://github.com/luanti-org/contentdb/issues/643 |
| 14:42 |
Krock |
the policy yet needs defining... but the options are there to redirect the git URL such that updates make it to the public |
| 14:43 |
Krock |
or the manual way - to upload a zip directly to ContentDB. |
| 14:43 |
MinetestBot |
[git] Desour -> luanti-org/luanti: Builtin: Print warnings if SHA256 of files does not match with build … 111460e https://github.com/luanti-org/luanti/commit/111460eccffce9eee185477ea660a6d5daa3eab7 (2026-06-07T14:41:04Z) |
| 14:43 |
MinetestBot |
[git] DragonWrangler1 -> luanti-org/luanti: Disable `visual_scale` for unsupported drawtypes (#17242) c694668 https://github.com/luanti-org/luanti/commit/c6946683bedc6ff81e135ede05ae1bc0a05a891a (2026-06-07T14:42:42Z) |
| 14:43 |
TenPlus1 |
so I would need to fork the mods, fix the issues and contact a cb dev to relink it to my git page ? |
| 14:45 |
Krock |
Yes, that's roughly how it can be done. The mod author must either agree to that or be declared unreachable, though. |
| 14:46 |
TenPlus1 |
been 2 1/2 years since mods last touched, and no answer to contacting |
| 14:46 |
Krock |
feel free to leave your opinion on my proposal in the linked issue |
| 14:46 |
TenPlus1 |
thanks dude, it's a handy proposal... and some mods are worthy of continuation |
| 14:53 |
TenPlus1 |
laters o/ |
| 14:56 |
rubenwardy |
We have an informal internal policy but need to polish and write it up |
| 14:58 |
Krock |
rubenwardy: does it roughly align with my proposal? When I get the chance I'd propose a PR to have it written down officially. |
| 14:59 |
rubenwardy |
Not exactly. We prefer that an org like minetest-mods or mt-mods adopt it, and we won't just edit a package's repo - we'd transfer it to the new user |
| 14:59 |
rubenwardy |
We'd also want to point out that you can just publish a maintained fork and we may migrate users to it at a later date |
| 15:00 |
|
chilledfrogs joined #luanti |
| 15:03 |
Krock |
Having forks is nice, but I'm afraid it would introduce more confusion for players which one to pick |
| 15:04 |
rubenwardy |
One concern we have to deal with is what happens if the original author comes back and wants to maintain their package again |
| 15:07 |
MTDiscord |
<rollerozxa> we have the ability to alias package names so people move onto a maintained fork when updating |
| 15:08 |
MTDiscord |
<rollerozxa> (and in that case the old unmaintained package would be eventually unpublished) |
| 15:11 |
rubenwardy |
Yeah that's what I mean by user migration |
| 15:14 |
rubenwardy |
Another concern is ensuring that the new version has sufficient maintainership, one of the reasons we might prefer mt-mods |
| 15:36 |
Krock |
Updated the issue - hopefully improved. |
| 15:46 |
|
chilledfrogs joined #luanti |
| 16:11 |
|
book`_ joined #luanti |
| 16:42 |
|
chilledfrogs joined #luanti |
| 16:42 |
|
chilledfrogs joined #luanti |
| 16:43 |
|
chilledfrogs joined #luanti |
| 16:43 |
|
chilledfrogs joined #luanti |
| 16:47 |
|
chilledfrogs joined #luanti |
| 16:47 |
|
chilledfrogs joined #luanti |
| 17:21 |
|
mrkubax10 joined #luanti |
| 18:41 |
|
chilledfrogs joined #luanti |
| 18:42 |
|
chilledfrogs joined #luanti |
| 18:52 |
|
jimc1827 joined #luanti |
| 19:43 |
|
crabycowman123 joined #luanti |
| 21:58 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #luanti |
| 22:17 |
[MatrxMT] |
<Blockhead256> Krock: I think your question is answered, yes, 1.5 months is probably long enough just imo as well too |
| 22:30 |
SwissalpS |
1.5 months isn't much time for somebody to come back from IRL situation like moving or illness. |
| 22:31 |
[MatrxMT] |
<Blockhead256> there are a lot of factors to weigh, like whether the mod has had any updates over an even longer period like a year |
| 22:32 |
|
panwolfram joined #luanti |
| 22:32 |
[MatrxMT] |
<Blockhead256> also as mentioned, the package alias can put users on a fork, and then this can be un-done if the original author resumes |
| 23:02 |
|
frostsnow joined #luanti |
| 23:05 |
|
chilledfrogs joined #luanti |
| 23:42 |
crabycowman123 |
Would I be correct to think that there's no on_step callback for players? I'd like to use moveresult to check when the player collides with a specific weirdly-shaped block. I see VoxeLibre uses moveresult for the cactus item deletion, but it looks like it just checks the whole block below the block where the player is for how cacti damage players. |
| 23:48 |
[MatrxMT] |
<Blockhead256> you're right, so a common pattern is for globalstep callbacks to iterate all players. If you're making an integrated game/modpack, consider putting all your "player onsteps" in one |
| 23:52 |
crabycowman123 |
Oh I guess if I want to check collision with an odd shape I can just extract the nodebox and do math on it |
| 23:52 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #luanti |
| 23:53 |
crabycowman123 |
though I think that would miss cases where something was touched only briefly |
