| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 01:13 |
|
xor_ghost joined #luanti |
| 01:18 |
|
xor_ghost joined #luanti |
| 01:23 |
|
kamdard joined #luanti |
| 03:20 |
|
gera joined #luanti |
| 04:00 |
|
MTDiscord joined #luanti |
| 06:12 |
|
illwieckz joined #luanti |
| 07:27 |
|
mrkubax10 joined #luanti |
| 08:14 |
|
FeXoR joined #luanti |
| 09:18 |
|
Verticen joined #luanti |
| 10:00 |
|
delgnam joined #luanti |
| 11:17 |
|
kaylie joined #luanti |
| 11:40 |
|
simon816 joined #luanti |
| 12:11 |
|
PoochInquisitor joined #luanti |
| 12:55 |
|
GNUHacker joined #luanti |
| 13:31 |
|
Tirili joined #luanti |
| 13:57 |
|
mrkubax10 joined #luanti |
| 14:08 |
|
kamdard joined #luanti |
| 14:10 |
|
PoochInquisitor joined #luanti |
| 14:39 |
|
fkbm joined #luanti |
| 14:52 |
|
est31 joined #luanti |
| 14:52 |
|
xor_ghost1 joined #luanti |
| 15:13 |
|
illwieckz_ joined #luanti |
| 15:30 |
|
FeXoR joined #luanti |
| 16:26 |
|
illwieckz joined #luanti |
| 16:31 |
|
bdju joined #luanti |
| 16:42 |
|
xor_ghost3 joined #luanti |
| 18:01 |
|
mrkubax10 joined #luanti |
| 18:11 |
|
xor_ghost joined #luanti |
| 18:15 |
|
whylay joined #luanti |
| 18:16 |
|
crazylad joined #luanti |
| 19:11 |
|
Tirili joined #luanti |
| 19:27 |
|
Sheriff_U3 joined #luanti |
| 19:32 |
Sheriff_U3 |
Codeberg's web UI got updated it looks like :) |
| 20:01 |
crazylad |
any thoughts/opinions on this? -> https://github.com/luanti-org/luanti/issues/17329 |
| 20:04 |
Sheriff_U3 |
I think it makes sense to throw it into #16846 |
| 20:04 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/luanti-org/luanti/issues/16846 -- Formspec: Make inventory slots stay hovered on formspec update by CrazyladMT |
| 20:15 |
|
halleyy joined #luanti |
| 20:25 |
|
illwieckz_ joined #luanti |
| 20:27 |
|
shnhzjz joined #luanti |
| 20:39 |
|
illwieckz joined #luanti |
| 20:52 |
|
mrkubax10 joined #luanti |
| 20:53 |
Sokomine |
seems ItemStack("- no item set -"):is_known() is true? bug or intetion i don't get? |
| 21:10 |
Sokomine |
i've added an issue |
| 21:19 |
cheapie |
It looks like doing that (calling ItemStack() with a completely invalid/unparseable string argument) is equivalent to calling ItemStack() with no arguments at all |
| 21:21 |
cheapie |
I'm not sure what the correct behavior really should be, I would be inclined to say error but there might be mods feeding arbitrary user input to ItemStack() that would start crashing |
| 21:24 |
Sheriff_U3 |
cheapie: then the mods should have validated the string before using it. |
| 21:24 |
cheapie |
They should have, but if you let people not do so then some of them won't |
| 21:26 |
Sokomine |
in this case i wanted to use ItemStack to do exactly that - validate the input without having to parse it myself |
| 21:26 |
cheapie |
That doesn't sound like something ItemStack() is meant to do |
| 21:28 |
|
whylay joined #luanti |
| 21:28 |
cheapie |
FWIW I suspect the reason :is_known() returns true is because the empty string is a registered item (the hand) |
| 21:30 |
Sokomine |
oh. that is very surprising. didn't know that. the connection is far from obvious. at least it ought to be mentionned that if ItemString fails to create one it creates an empty one, and that/why an empty one is known? |
| 21:38 |
|
vampirefrog joined #luanti |
| 21:38 |
|
vampirefrog joined #luanti |
| 21:44 |
Sokomine |
cheapie: perhaps you can add your thoughts/observations to the issue |
| 21:47 |
cheapie |
done |
| 21:51 |
Sokomine |
thanks! |
| 22:05 |
|
est31 joined #luanti |
| 22:17 |
|
est31 joined #luanti |
| 22:33 |
|
panwolfram joined #luanti |
